that kinda brings up another point: a better description of porn could be to say 'the EXPLOITATION' of the human body' could be considered porn.
the human body is a beautiful creation, and theres nothing wrong with appreciating it and displaying it naturally [naturally being the keyword there]
remember that book a while back, had a bunch of photos of nude mothers holding their new babies? a bunch of werid ass photos exploring the intimate connection between a mother and her child bla bla bla..
just cuz there were nude women holding nude babies you're not gonna say thats child porn [unless you're on psych-medication]. its about a mother and her baby and their wonderful connection and the beauty of it all.. ok sure i'll buy that. its natural [sorta]
but if i show a woman sticking a cucumber up one hole and a water hose up the other while sucking down [whatever].. wtf?? how is that in any way 'natural'?? thats just dirty ass porn. end of story.
displaying the body is ok, exploiting the body and showing it.. well thats when it gets 'sticky'. but maybe im just talkin outta my ass.. - JAG
it's only after you've lost everything, that you're free to do anything..