I'm a crazy movie aficionado. I love the movies that pull you in with their amazing shots (colors and compo and all the artsy stuff) and vivid characters(well developed and sincere, no vin diesel(sorry)). Two of my top movies are Amelie and Lost in Translation. They touched a soft spot in my dark abysmal pit. Go ahead and call me 'emo'.![]()
Anyways, I think these pieces complement eachother (maybe because they're the same size?) and yet have very different moods. Please crit the hell out of them. But do keep it rational.
I already posted these on my sketchbook thread but I wanted to see them next to eachother since I gave the first one away.. I made the first one 6 months ago and the second one 2 weeks ago, all with traditional oil.
Sorry about the glare, too much texture on the darks + varnish = bird sh*t.
![]()





Reply With Quote



I also spent more time on it. I've been experimenting with pastels and low contrast (inspired by Monet). I'll try to separate the bg and fg a bit more.
And yea, I was trying to play with the shape of her hair, It made the comp more dynamic.
I think definition is important. The background shouldn't always be defined it's just there for ambience and mood. Right?
pld: . Awesome concept. So you are saying the LiT piece lacks basic design qualities. Unfotrunately it is too late too fix that, but I will improve it.



Bookmarks