
Originally Posted by
TinyBird
Personally the "wrapping over a mountain" look doesn't really work because you're going with a design that's a mix of a bird and a moose which to my eye doesn't translate to serpentine motions as naturally than a Chinese dragon (if the creature were more overall fluidly stylized, that'd be a different thing), especially since the "cut" makes the body parts two separate huge lumps, confusing the first time viewer. On another point, the whole hindquarters of the creature look way too big in the painting for me to believe it can actually fly without its butt drooping down. In the sketches the perspective makes the legs much more streamlined and smaller that makes the design work, but that's what missing in the painting in my opinion.
Also the way the tail feathers bend comes off more like a tail of a nine tailed fox, rather than that of a bird which again is present in the sketches but not in the painting.
Just sticking more to the original sketches would help a lot I think.
Also on more fundamental level, the creature has very flat forms. And it looks like you've painted the torso from side, but then added the wing there too, causing it to look really awkwardly angled, not to mention you cut off the creatures view to the mountains by slapping the wing there for no real reason. Do you have a undersketch for this and could you show it?
Bookmarks