hm... I gotta disagree with p sage on some points
but I also agree on a lot of points, so here's my wrap-up of the book, and I have to say it helped me a LOT when i started drawing.
- the book is seriously dangerous if read without guidance or appropriate warnings, or if read in isolation
- the book is super helpful if you understand it correctly, because it shows you kind of a hidden back door into the world of drawing that you never would have found otherwise.
- the book does teach a certain way of drawing - which is realistic copying. if you were to read only this book and nothing else, you'd at best become the world's best human camera, but you'll never be able to draw anything creative. that's what loomis is for
- doing those exercises over and over again is silly. I dropped the book halfway through and skipped a lot. the exercises are not there for practice, they're there to prove a point and give you that "ah-ha! i would've never thought about it that way" moment. that's all, but it's enough
-the most important lesson in the book is not about drawing, it's about seeing. and that's incredibly important to any artist:
DRAWING IS SEEING
...and your seeing is fundamentally screwed when you start to draw. your brain just isn't up to the task because most of your visual perception uses mechanisms that were "good enough" when you were 8 and haven't changed since. have a look at her chapters on symbols, and you'll see what I mean. they're absolutely must-read!
phew, i think that sums it up nicely. once you get to the point where you feel that she's made her case and you won't forget it anytime soon, drop the book and move on to loomis or bridgman or anyone else who teaches construction and line quality and gesture drawing
sooooo.... long story short: from looking at your sketchbook you're doing everything right. you got 'drawing on the right side of the brain', you got loomis, nothing can go wrong if you stick with it!
best of luck

Bookmarks